I myself believe such you can attempt any task using anything, any object. The efficiency varies depending on each object, and would you rather spend extra time trying to complete something, and use more effort to do an essential task or have it done by a tool made to be efficient at that given task.
An example can be given to support the claim of efficiency and life.
A starving man in the wild has to choose his weapon to hunt prey.
Hes given an option of a knife, bow, crossbow, and a hunting gun.
His obvious choice would be a hunting rifle, which would almost guarantee him a meal, because he would spend least amount of time getting the meal.
Hunting rifle is the most effective tool to hunt in that given scenario.
Knife is the worst choice, because it gives a low chance of killing the prey because it would prolong the hunt and would result in a least favourable time.
Correspondence theory is very vague about an example such as this due to rating.
Rating an object to be more effective at something is a pure coherence theorist view.
The rating between the weapons reflects the coherence between the weapons, and not the truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment